AAJ MEMBERS ONLY - Regular, President's Club, Sustaining or Life members:
Interested in joining AAJ Click here.
Heuristic Representative Biases---Why Jurors Decide Cases Contrary to the Facts
With: Gregory S. Cusimano
Powered by Playback Now
Scroll Up
Scroll Down
-
How We Think---Overview of the Two Thinking Systems
How We Think---Overview of the Two Thinking Systems
Thomas D. Penfield
Advocacy Track: Neuroscience and the Law---Using Nobel Prize Winning Theories for Preparation and Trial of a Case
-
What We Think---Norms, Surprises, and Causes
What We Think---Norms, Surprises, and Causes
Michael P. Koskoff
Advocacy Track: Neuroscience and the Law---Using Nobel Prize Winning Theories for Preparation and Trial of a Case
-
Why We Think---How Judgment Happens
Why We Think---How Judgment Happens
Jerome F. O'Neill
Advocacy Track: Neuroscience and the Law---Using Nobel Prize Winning Theories for Preparation and Trial of a Case
-
-
Availability Heurisitic an Anchoring Effect---How …
Availability Heurisitic an Anchoring Effect---How Jurors Evaluate the Evidence in Light of Life Experiences
Jacob G. Vigil
Advocacy Track: Neuroscience and the Law---Using Nobel Prize Winning Theories for Preparation and Trial of a Case
-
Heuristic Representative Biases---Why Jurors Deci …
Heuristic Representative Biases---Why Jurors Decide Cases Contrary to the Facts
Gregory S. Cusimano
Advocacy Track: Neuroscience and the Law---Using Nobel Prize Winning Theories for Preparation and Trial of a Case
-
Framing and Choices---What Jurors Perceive as You …
Framing and Choices---What Jurors Perceive as You Present Your Case
Mark S. Mandell
Advocacy Track: Neuroscience and the Law---Using Nobel Prize Winning Theories for Preparation and Trial of a Case
-
-
The Role of Neuroscience in Jury Decision Making
The Role of Neuroscience in Jury Decision Making
Robyn L. Wishart
Advocacy Track: Neuroscience and the Law---Using Nobel Prize Winning Theories for Preparation and Trial of a Case
-
Neuroscience of Storytelling
Neuroscience of Storytelling
Paul J. Scoptur
Advocacy Track: Neuroscience and the Law---Using Nobel Prize Winning Theories for Preparation and Trial of a Case
-
Applying Attribution Principles to Proof of Causation
Applying Attribution Principles to Proof of Causation
Howard L. Nations
Advocacy Track: Neuroscience and the Law---Using Nobel Prize Winning Theories for Preparation and Trial of a Case
-
Heuristic Representative Biases---Why Jurors Decide Cases Contrary to the Facts
Session#: 415-036
Advocacy Track: Neuroscience and the Law---Using Nobel Prize Winning Theories for Preparation and Trial of a CaseAvailable Downloads
Click on which handouts you would like to download. If your download does not start automatically then right-click (control + click on Mac) and "save as" to download them.
You must be logged in and have purchased access to this course to view/download the handouts.
- Heuristic Representative Biases---Why Jurors Decide Cases Contrary to the Facts
- AAJ Annual CLE Form
This course does not currently have any reviews.